"No. Katrina didn't cause damage where I'm from."
I still get asked that question. I'm from a tiny north central Louisiana town named Dodson, population 350 and dropping. (Well, technically I'm from six miles west of there.) Hurricanes Katrina and Rita caused devastating destruction and horrific loss of life.
But judging from the Hurricane Digital Memory Bank, you would think only New Orleans was effected by both these hurricanes. In fact, whole communities were wiped out on the Mississippi Coast when Katrina struck. Likewise, Rita damaged or destroyed nearly 95 percent of the structures of Cameron Parish, just south of Lake Charles. There there is no tag for "Cameron Parish," and only two items are available under "Lake Charles."
Why is that?
For one reason, the archive is created in conjunction with the University of New Orleans, so it is not surprising that most items would cover that institution's immediate area. Also, Katrina (rightfully, to a degree) receives so much media attention.* In a family sense, Rita is the shy, neglected sister to popular Katrina.
I had never heard of this archive. No one I know has heard of it, either, as far as I can tell. So as a purely digital media archive, how effective is it? As far as accessibility, no physical archive can compare. But is an archive presented in this medium truly revolutionary if is not advertised to those persons who can help it grow?
I'm
I've posted a link to this archive onto my Facebook, urging friends and family members effected by Rita to add their stories and photos. Maybe I'll add my own, however trivial it may seem.
*Did anyone watch the recent coverage of Hurricane Isaac? (My in-laws live in Baton Rouge, and some predictions had Isaac hitting Dodson as a tropical storm. I was riveted.) It was nauseating how excited The Weather Channel got as the storm intensified and moved toward New Orleans.
No comments:
Post a Comment